Alpha Institute for Advanced Studies

overview.doc

InTech-Full_Chapter_Review_Report.pdf

a234thpapernotes5.pdf

In a message dated 17/12/2012 13:25:04 GMT Standard Time, writes:

It is interesting that the special central symmetry defines a force. The Minkowski space is the same when described by cartesian or spherical coordinates, but different symmetries are considered. The choice of a coordinate system (symmetry) should not change physical properties but this seems to be the case here.

Horst

Verschickt: Mo, 17 Dez 2012 1:57 pm
Betreff: 234(4): Comparison of Minkowski Method with Classical Kinematics

The classical kinematic method was first developed in UFT196, and in this note it is compared with the elegant and simple Minkowski cosmology being developed now. The conclusion is that the classical kinematics must be abandoned in favour of the simplest type of relativistic kinematics, valid for ALL orbits. This note developed into a long essay with equations, a kind of technical essay. The idea of a centrally directed force of attraction being “counterbalanced” by a centrifugal force is hopelessly incorrect. It is replaced by the original idea of general relativity, but with the metric shorn down to its simplest form – the Minkowski metric. In general relativity an orbit is a path along spacetime, it is not caused by the attraction between M and m, as is well known. The same Minkowski metric was used in UFT231 for LENR, so this method can also be used for LENR, as well as for cosmology.

In a message dated 17/12/2012 10:51:43 GMT Standard Time, writes:

Are you sure that the second derivative of r vanishes in eq.(6)? The conservation of momentum (8) is for the VECTOR r.
Eq.(7) would mean that

r dot = const,

but for an ellipse r dot changes sign in an orbit and cannot be constant. Nevertheless we have

bold r dot = const

because the momentum is shifted between radial and angular components.

Horst

Verschickt: So, 16 Dez 2012 3:36 pm
Betreff: 234(3): Description of any Orbit with Minkowski Metric and Force

This note calculates the Minkowski force (22) of any observable orbit using only the Minkowski metric (32) and no other concept. This cosmology is preferred to all other cosmologies by Ockham’s Razor. It can be reduced to a Newtonian limit but at the expense of introducing other concepts such as “attraction” and “potential energy”. In this Minkowski method any orbit is due to the metric. This is similar to the idea of general relativity but always simpler and therefore always preferred by Ockhams’ Razor. It is preferred to all cosmologies based on a spacetime more complicated than the Minkowski spacetime. It eliminates big bang, black holes, dark matter and other incorrect ideas of the old physics in favour of the simplest description consistent with all the data. It may be used to rationalize any orbit from the solar system to galactic and supergalactic. This Minkowski method differs from more complicated theories in that the radial part of the total relativistic linear momentum is a constant of motion. This eliminates the idea of the Hooke Newton inverse square law, which is a more complicated description of orbits than this one. The force law is not that of Einsteinian general relativity, it is a “centripetal force” but with negative sign.

Nadolig Llawen a Blwyddyn Newydd Dda!

Sent: 17/12/2012 04:50:38 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: UFT 233 in Spanish

Posted today.

Have a happy holiday all !

Dave

a234thpapernotes4.pdf